Your UX sucks.
Here’s the receipts.
An AI agent uses your product like a real user, roasts everything that sucks, and turns it into Jira tickets you can ship. Not vibes, actual UX research.
https://
Paste your own site, or a competitor you love to hate. Takes about two minutes.
your-app.com
Example finding · 1 of 140 found
1
Your form rejects the password with a generic error. Users have no idea it needs a number, so they assume your product is broken and leave.
Cites the receipts fromNielsen Norman·WCAG 2.2·Laws of UX·Fitts · Hick · Jakob · Miller
Why ClapBack
A senior-level UX audit, back before your next standup.
Same frameworks the pros use, the same fresh perspective real users bring, delivered as a fix list you can ship today.
Answers in minutes
Paste a URL and get a ranked report back before your coffee's cold. No recruiting, no scheduling.
Priced like lunch
Pro-grade heuristics from $49, expense it without a meeting. Pay once, no retainer.
A fresh set of eyes
The agent has never seen your product, so it hits every rough edge you've gone blind to.
How it works
Three steps. Zero meetings.
01
Paste a URL
No install, no SDK, no access tokens. Just the link to whatever you want roasted.
02
The agent goes in
It signs up, clicks around, fills your forms and breaks your flows, like a real user with zero patience.
03
You get receipts
A ranked report of every issue: cited, screenshotted, and ready to triage and ship.
The finding card
Every roast has receipts.
No vibes. Each finding carries a severity, a category, a cited rule, an annotated screenshot, a plain-language reason it matters, and a fix with an effort estimate.
- ✓Severity: Blocker / Major / Minor
- ✓Backed by Nielsen, WCAG & Laws of UX
- ✓Suggested fix + quick-win / deep-fix estimate
- ✓One click → a pre-filled Jira or Linear ticket
3
Six pricing tiers, chosen by nobody
Six tiers with eleven feature rows each. Paradox of choice kicks in and people pick nothing. Your pricing page is a decision-paralysis machine.
Suggested fix
Collapse to three tiers, highlight one, push the full matrix below the fold.
⚒ Deep fix · ~2 days
Credibility
The roast is savage. The citations are not.
Nielsen's 10 Heuristics
#1 Visibility of status
#5 Error prevention
#9 Help users recover
#5 Error prevention
#9 Help users recover
WCAG 2.2 · A / AA
1.4.3 Contrast
2.4.7 Focus visible
3.3.1 Error identification
2.4.7 Focus visible
3.3.1 Error identification
Laws of UX
Hick's · Fitts's
Jakob's · Miller's
Proximity · Familiarity
Jakob's · Miller's
Proximity · Familiarity
100%
of findings cite a named, checkable rule. Argue with the agent, not us.
The wedge
Your UX backlog, already organized.
Other tools hand you a list and walk away. ClapBack writes the whole ticket: severity, evidence, a concrete fix. Then it bulk-exports to Jira or Linear, where your team actually triages.
6 findingsin this report · sorted by severity
Creating an account is a guessing game
Your form rejects the password with a generic error. Users have no idea it needs a number, so they assume your product is broken and leave.
Suggested fix
Inline, field-level validation that shows the requirements before submit, not a vague banner after.
⚡ Quick win · ~1 hr
1 in 12 men can't see your buy button
Your most important button sits at 2.1:1 contrast. Roughly 1 in 12 men literally cannot find the thing you most want them to click.
Suggested fix
Raise contrast to at least 4.5:1. Realistically this is one CSS variable.
⚡ Quick win · ~1 hr
Six pricing tiers, chosen by nobody
Six tiers with eleven feature rows each. Paradox of choice kicks in and people pick nothing. Your pricing page is a decision-paralysis machine.
Suggested fix
Collapse to three tiers, highlight one, push the full matrix below the fold.
⚒ Deep fix · ~2 days
Onboarding is a road with no end in sight
There's no stepper, so users can't tell if they're almost done or stuck in an infinite hellscape. Most bail right at step 3.
Suggested fix
Add a stepper with explicit “step X of 5” labeling and a clear finish line.
⚡ Quick win · ~1 hr
Saving and self-destruct look identical
Settings groups unrelated toggles together and splits related ones apart. A destructive action is one pixel from Save, so someone will rage-quit by accident.
Suggested fix
Regroup by function, add spacing, and gate the destructive action behind a confirm.
⚡ Quick win · ~1 hr
Your checkout page looks like a scam
No security badges, no card-type icons, and the footer says 2021. The page looks abandoned, so users hesitate to enter card details.
Suggested fix
Add familiar trust markers, card icons, and (please) fix the copyright year.
⚡ Quick win · ~1 hr
Exports straight intoJiraLinearSlackGitHubNotion
FAQ
The skeptical-PM section.
How is this different from a manual UX audit?
A consultant takes weeks and a retainer. ClapBack takes minutes and a URL: same frameworks, zero scheduling, and the output is tickets, not a 40-slide deck.
How is this different from other AI audit tools?
Most stop at “here's a list.” We don't. Every finding comes as a fully-written Jira or Linear ticket: severity, screenshot, a concrete fix. Your team triages right where they already work.
Do I need to install anything?
No SDK, no script tag, no access. Paste a URL and the agent uses your product like any other visitor.
Is this a subscription?
No. One-time scan, one-time price, tiered by site size. Optional workspace seats only if your team wants to track findings over time.
Will it mess with my data?
It browses like a user. Point it at staging if live writes scare you. It won't delete your database. It's not that kind of savage.
How accurate is an AI agent?
Every finding cites a named rule and shows the screenshot. If a receipt's wrong, you'll see it in two seconds. Dismiss it and move on.
Find out what your
users won’t tell you.
https://
Roast your own site or a competitor’s · no card required